His comment is as follows,
"Yes, one might expect a lawyer to back up his or her assertions. Since you never do, I guess you haven't yet taken that class in law school. "
This was written by a man who fits the behavioral pattern I laid out in that post. Even more amusing, he consistently refers to me as a lawyer or law student. Not once on this blog or elsewhere have I stated I am a lawyer or law student and my profile clearly lists my current occupation.
Anti-gunners are sad and predictable but I'll be damned if they're not amusing as hell sometimes. It never hurts to have someone on the anti-rights side make themselves look bad.
Did you read Larry Corriea a couple days ago, with nickwolf? I always like having idiots on the opposing viewpoint. It's funny.
This is my first time i visit here.Very good and funny writing I guess I am not the only one having all the enjoyment here! keep up the good work.
He still has yet to elaborate on his contention that "rights only exist when social understandings include the concept" and how that completely contradicts his simultaneous acknowledgment that slavery was unjust.
You are expecting self-introspection and a middle-school grade level of reading comprehension and subject retention from an individual that recently accused all "Tea Baggers" (his words, not mine) across the board, universally, of being racists, homophobes, mysoginists, and so forth?
Yeah, that was your first mistake ;). Methinks you might have struck a nerve with him...
Methinks you might have struck a nerve with him...
Y'know Linoge, I tend to do that to bigoted anti's.
Post a Comment