My chili has beans, therefore chili has beans. I don't know what the hell the rest of you people are eating.
Oh yeah, Bonnie & Breda will be on the radio tonight at 7PM discussing some of life's most important and contentious topics including Glock vs. 1911, Pepsi vs. Coke, Drunk vs. Sober, and of course Beans vs. No Beans.
So, tune into Butts, Boobs & Guns and discuss what's better, T or A (actually we'd better leave that for GBC.) You don't want to piss Breda off on her show.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
7 comments:
I've had Chilli sans beans...it sucks!
The way I make chilli is by opening up a bunch of cans and dumping them in a pot to simmer all day. Beans, corn, tomatoes, nothing is safe!
Heathens!! You and Weer'd need to repent and make things right.
Chili has historically and correctly been made with no beans.
http://whatscookingamerica.net/History/Chili/ChiliHistory.htm
Beans were and are a side dish to chili. -- Give up your abominable ways.
:)
"Chili has historically incorrectly been made with no beans."
Fixed it for you! ; ]
Pizza was historically served without cheese or meat toppings.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_pizza
Does not make it right or good eats!
I swing both ways, actually.
When it comes to chili.
Women lack a certain...something.
HOG!
I have a massive HOG, it's called a P220ST.
Post a Comment