Thursday, January 6, 2011

They Have No Answer

The Democrats have no substantive answer to the Tea Party movement, so what do they do? Oh, just attack the American voters who comprise it. From the mouth of Democrat Steny Hoyer,

"There are a whole lot of people in the Tea Party that I see in these polls who don’t want any compromise. My presumption is they have unhappy families. All of you have been in families: single-parent, two-parents, whatever. Multiple parent and a stepfather. The fact is life is about trying to reach accommodation with one another so we can move forward. That is certainly what democracy is about. So if we are going to move forward compromise is necessary."


So, because a large segment of the American populace fundamentally disagrees with you on substantive policy issues they must live in unhappy families? Might as well presume they're all cousin humping rednecks who beat their wives too. That'd have as much basis in reality as Hoyer's moronic presumption. Sigh, this is what I've come to expect from the left.

As for "compromise" well no, we don't want to "compromise" with you. We sure as hell don't want to move forward in the direction the progressives want to take us. I think we sent that message loud & clear during the midterm elections. Besides, liberals, in their typical fashion of having problems with simple definitions, do not understand the meaning of compromise. Even if they did understand it, one should never compromise on basic, fundamental principles. If we compromise on the American ideals of freedom, liberty, or property rights we are left with nothing except a smaller piece of cake to steal the next time they get a sweet tooth for what's ours.

Go get bent Mr. Hoyer.

H/T to Hotair

2 comments:

Robert McDonald said...

Compromise in the way he means would be like one parent telling the other, "You can molest one of the kids, but not both."

NotClauswitz said...

When they say "compromise with us" they really mean "acquiesce to us."