"If a business only exists for profits and not for jobs, should the government be facilitating their growth or regulating them into oblivion?"
- Nemski - of Delaware Liberal
Even the politico piece he links to makes me want to bang my head against the wall. From their piece,
"Profits may eventually bolster employment, but the chief priority remains the bottom line."
Please show me private business ventures in which the chief priority is not the bottom line and point me to how successful they are. Profits are a good thing for any business, since employment can't be bolstered without the business making profits. I keep forgetting that "profit" is a four letter word to those who don't like free market capitalism.
Either way Romney is a liberal, big government, gun-grabbing schmuck who is only marginally less repulsive than the current liberal, big government, gun-grabbing schmuch currently occupying 1600 Pennsylvania Ave.