"If I had to commute on the NYC subway, for that matter. I'd probably want to be armed regardless of the law."
Anti-gunner MikeB, in a stunning admission.
So I guess Mike will admit that if he wanted to carry right now he could, regardless of the law. Right? If he makes the value judgment that carrying illegally is worth the risk of getting caught, then he carries anyway. That's exactly what every violent felon who owns and carries a gun does, despite a myriad of laws proscribing such actions.
How do you stop that? Laws, no matter how numerous, cannot stop criminals from carrying weapons if they so choose.
I'm getting quite thet laugh out of an anti-gunner admitting he'd want to be armed even if it meant committing a felony. Odd, he wants to restrict the rights of all of us with more laws, yet openly admits that he might not follow them. Even worse, despite this admission he will still claim that "more laws" are the solution to the problem. I see a career in politics for MikeB.